Prop Firm Reviews
Latest verified trader reviews across all firms.
Every trader review here is backed by proof
WhatProp requires proof of a real account or payout before a trader review is published, so what you read is verifiable, not marketing. Assessments written by our own team are labeled Editorial review. Traded with a firm? Write the first verified review.
- Tradeify3.8Jul 23, 2026
by WhatProp Editorial TeamEditorial
Daily payouts and 100% splits for futures traders who read the rules
Tradeify's calling card is payout speed: its Daily-payout funded accounts and Lightning instant line advertise withdrawals on a cadence most futures funders cannot match, alongside Growth evaluations at 90% splits and straight evaluations at 100%, across $25,000 to $150,000 accounts with scaling advertised toward $1,000,000. The platform stack is properly professional — Tradovate, NinjaTrader, TradingView, Quantower, Sierra Chart and Rithmic — and payout rails are unusually well documented: Rise and Plane for bank transfers worldwide, plus USDT/USDC. The reasons for caution: plan families differ meaningfully (Daily vs Growth vs Lightning carry different prices, splits and drawdown styles), stated leverage is a conservative 1:30, and the firm does not yet publish a crawlable payout-proof feed to back the daily-payout marketing. US incorporation and strong platform support make it credible; the gap between marketing cadence and public evidence keeps the rating measured.
All Tradeify reviews → - Pipstone Capital3.8Jul 23, 2026
by WhatProp Editorial TeamEditorial
Flat $49 instant funding — simple, small, and still unproven
Pipstone Capital's offer is disarmingly simple: instant one-step accounts at a flat $49 across sizes from $5,000 to $100,000, a 100% split headline, and platform choice of MetaTrader 5, cTrader and Match-Trader with 1:100 leverage on forex and metals. A flat price regardless of account size is unusual — it makes the larger accounts look like obvious value, which is precisely why the fine print matters: drawdown limits, payout eligibility and scaling rules determine what that $49 actually buys, and the firm's published scaling ceiling is a modest $25,000 allocation. The Cyprus base is a small plus for jurisdiction-conscious traders. The record is the open question: one published payout confirmation and a young operation mean the headline terms are still largely untested in public. Cheap enough to try with money you can afford to lose entirely; not yet evidenced enough to treat as a primary funding route.
All Pipstone Capital reviews → - Orion Funded4.7Jul 23, 2026
by WhatProp Editorial TeamEditorial
$29 three-step entry and 100% splits — if you accept MT5-only
Orion Funded's Select program is one of the cheapest credible routes to funded capital: a three-step evaluation from $29 for a $5,000 account, scaling through sizes to $200,000, with splits advertised up to 100% and a two-step Standard line (plus swing variants) for traders who prefer fewer phases. Leverage is the standard 1:100 across forex, indices, metals, commodities, stocks and crypto, and the allocation ceiling is $200,000. The firm's payout feed is genuinely active, with over a dozen published confirmations — strong evidence for a firm at this price point. Two limitations stand out: MetaTrader 5 is the only supported platform, which rules out cTrader and TradingView loyalists, and three-step evaluations mean three chances to break a rule before funding, so cheap entry trades off against a longer road. For patient traders comfortable in MT5, the price-to-terms ratio here is hard to beat.
All Orion Funded reviews → - My Funded Futures4.6Jul 23, 2026
by WhatProp Editorial TeamEditorial
A futures funding heavyweight with a plan for every temperament
My Funded Futures has become one of the recognizable names in futures funding, and its lineup explains why: Starter for low-cost entry, Builder for progressive scaling, Flex for rule tolerance, and Rapid for traders who want the shortest route, across $10,000 to $150,000 evaluations (with larger standard accounts above that) and splits that reach 100% on several plans. Platform support is the full modern futures stack — Tradovate, NinjaTrader, TradingView, Volumetrica, ATAS, Quantower and DXtrade — on CME-group products, with scaling headroom advertised toward $1,000,000. Payouts run through Rise payroll, bank transfer and crypto. Buyers should note that each plan family carries its own drawdown style, consistency rules and payout cadence — the four-way menu is powerful but genuinely different plan to plan — and the firm's payout evidence lives on its own channels rather than a proof feed our crawler can verify. A top-tier futures option, provided you pick the plan that matches how you actually trade.
All My Funded Futures reviews → - Maven Trading4.7Jul 23, 2026
by WhatProp Editorial TeamEditorial
The cheapest serious entry in prop trading, three speeds to funding
Maven Trading's defining feature is accessibility: evaluations start with a $2,000 account for around $30, and every account size comes in three formats — one-step, two-step or three-step — so traders choose between paying more for a faster route or less for more checkpoints. Instant funding and a premium Elite one-step line round out the menu, with a standard 80% split, 1:75 leverage, and scaling advertised toward a $1,000,000 allocation. Platforms are modern — Match-Trader, cTrader and MetaTrader 5 — and payouts run through bank transfer, Rise, crypto and e-wallets, with a published payout feed already showing multiple confirmations. The compromises: 80% is below the 90-100% splits rivals now advertise, and 1:75 leverage sits slightly under the usual 1:100. Neither is disqualifying at these prices. For newer traders who want real skin in the game without risking three-figure fees, Maven is arguably the most sensible starting point on this list.
All Maven Trading reviews → - Lucid Trading4.7Jul 23, 2026
by WhatProp Editorial TeamEditorial
One program, done properly — futures funding without the maze
Lucid Trading takes the opposite approach to most funders: a single Pro Evaluation line, $25,000 to $150,000, one step, 90% split. No tier maze, no overlapping variants — the whole offer fits on one screen. Platform support is thoroughly professional for futures — NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, Quantower and TradingView — and the payout rails are unusually well documented: Plaid instant bank transfers for US traders, WorkMarket by ADP internationally, and crypto (BTC/ETH/USDT/USDC) as a fallback. That payments setup, running through regulated US processors, is a quiet trust signal many louder rivals lack. Limits to know: the allocation ceiling of $150,000 is modest — this is not the firm for traders chasing seven-figure scaling plans — and a public payout-proof feed has not yet been published. For futures traders who value simplicity and clean US-friendly payouts over headline scaling numbers, Lucid is an easy firm to recommend.
All Lucid Trading reviews → - GOAT Funded Futures4.3Jul 23, 2026
by WhatProp Editorial TeamEditorial
Flexible futures funding with up to 100% splits and receipts to show
GOAT Funded Futures, the futures arm of the GOAT brand, offers one of the more flexible lineups in its niche: end-of-day drawdown (EOD) challenges for traders who hate intraday trailing rules, a Flex variant, a cheap Sprint entry at $64, and instant-funded accounts from $25,000 to $150,000, with scaling advertised toward $750,000. Splits reach 100% on the EOD and instant lines. Execution runs through Tradovate, DXtrade, Quantower and TradingView across CME-group products, and — importantly for a young firm — it has published over twenty payout confirmations. Trade-offs: the platform stack omits NinjaTrader and Rithmic, which some futures veterans will miss, and split and pricing details differ enough between EOD, Flex, Sprint and Instant that the comparison table deserves real attention before buying. The combination of EOD drawdown options and a visible payout feed makes it a credible pick among newer futures funders.
All GOAT Funded Futures reviews → - FXIFY4.3Jul 23, 2026
by WhatProp Editorial TeamEditorial
Instant funding depth and 90% splits from a 2023-vintage UK firm
FXIFY has been operating since 2023 — meaningful tenure in a market where firms appear and vanish in months — and its product depth shows it. Instant funding comes in full and Lite tiers from $19, evaluations run in one-, two- and three-phase formats (Lightning being the quick single-phase route), and funded splits reach 90% on most plans. Platform support covers MetaTrader 4 and 5, DXtrade and TradingView, with futures connectivity via Tradovate and NinjaTrader appearing in the lineup, and scaling is advertised to a $400,000 allocation. The firm publishes payout confirmations regularly, with a double-digit public record. Watch two things: stated leverage of 1:50 is tighter than the 1:100 many rivals offer, and the wide mix of instant tiers and phase formats means rules — especially on instant accounts — differ per product. A well-rounded, established option, particularly for traders who want funding today rather than after an evaluation.
All FXIFY reviews → - FunderPro Futures4.2Jul 23, 2026
by WhatProp Editorial TeamEditorial
FunderPro's futures arm: pro-grade platforms, single-step simplicity
FunderPro Futures brings the FunderPro brand to the futures market with a clean, one-step evaluation across $50,000, $100,000 and $150,000 accounts and a 90% split once funded, scaling toward a $500,000 allocation. The platform roster is the real differentiator: Rithmic and Tradovate connectivity plus NinjaTrader, ATAS, Quantower, TradingView, TradeStation and Sierra Chart — a genuinely professional futures stack that most CFD-heritage funders cannot match. Pricing sits in the market's middle band ($219-$449 by size). The caveats: the futures arm is younger than its CFD sibling and does not yet publish its own payout-proof feed, so funded traders are leaning on the parent brand's reputation rather than arm-specific evidence, and withdrawal rails are listed simply as e-wallet/withdrawal without the rich rail detail some rivals document. For futures traders who care most about trading on their preferred professional platform, it is an easy shortlist entry.
All FunderPro Futures reviews → - FTM4.6Jul 23, 2026
by WhatProp Editorial TeamEditorial
Fast Nitro evaluations with 90% splits, still building its record
FTM (Funded Trader Markets) centres its offer on the 1-Step Nitro evaluation: a single phase to funding with a 90% split, sold alongside a 2-Step Plus variant and instant-funding accounts in Standard and Pro tiers, with scaling advertised to a $300,000 allocation. Platform coverage is strong for a young firm — MetaTrader 4 and 5, cTrader and TradeLocker — with 1:100 leverage across forex, metals, indices, commodities and crypto. Payouts run through crypto, bank transfer and Rise, and the firm has begun publishing confirmations, though only a couple are on public record so far. The one-phase-to-funded route with a 90% split is a genuinely competitive core product; what separates contenders from keepers at this stage is a payout history, and FTM's is still short. Reasonable pricing, wide platform choice, and a simple flagship program make it worth a look for traders comfortable backing a newer operation.
All FTM reviews → - Funded Squad4.7Jul 23, 2026
by WhatProp Editorial TeamEditorial
100% split headline and a $2M ceiling — light on proof so far
Funded Squad leads with numbers built to turn heads: a 100% profit split across its lineup, scaling advertised to a $2,000,000 allocation, and entry points from a $15 challenge for a $2,000 account up to a $100,000 two-step evaluation. The product range covers instant funding (Lite and Pro), one-, two- and three-step evaluations, and a static-drawdown option, on Match-Trader, TradeLocker and cTrader with 1:100 leverage. Payout options are broad on paper — bank transfer, cards, PayPal, USDT/BTC and Rise. What the package lacks is evidence: the public payout record is essentially a single confirmation, and a 100%-split business model depends heavily on fees and rule enforcement, so the drawdown and consistency fine print deserves a careful read before buying. Attractive terms, wide platform support, honest question marks — treat the headline numbers as marketing until the payout feed fills in.
All Funded Squad reviews → - FundedNext4.9Jul 23, 2026
by WhatProp Editorial TeamEditorial
The broadest program menu in the market, forex and futures under one roof
FundedNext's pitch is breadth. Seven supported platforms span both worlds — MetaTrader 4 and 5, cTrader and Match-Trader for CFDs, Tradovate, NinjaTrader and TradingView for futures — and the program menu covers Stellar one-step and two-step evaluations, an instant-funding line, and the newer Flex plan whose split reaches 95%, with accounts from $2,000 up to $200,000. Payout rails are equally wide: bank transfer, multiple stablecoin networks, Rise and more, with a steady stream of published payout confirmations backing the marketing. The trade-offs are typical of a firm this size rather than alarming: rules differ meaningfully between Stellar, Instant and Flex — consistency requirements and payout cadence included — so the plan you buy matters more than the brand, and the sheer menu can overwhelm a first-time buyer. As an all-rounder serving both forex and futures traders with documented payouts, FundedNext is one of the strongest overall packages currently listed.
All FundedNext reviews → - FundedHive4.4Jul 23, 2026
by WhatProp Editorial TeamEditorial
Aggressive pricing and 1:200 leverage, unconventional program maze
FundedHive competes on raw numbers: evaluations start at $19 for a $5,000 account, leverage runs to 1:200 — double the usual ceiling — and the firm advertises up to a 100% split with scaling headroom toward a $1,000,000 allocation. It has also published one of the more active payout feeds among newer firms, with over twenty confirmations on record. Trading runs on cTrader and MetaTrader 5 across forex, metals, indices and CFDs. The hesitation is structural: the lineup mixes 1-StepBee evaluations, a Pay-From-Profits model and tiered Golden Tower levels, and the naming makes it genuinely hard to tell which product carries which rules — read the fine print on drawdown and payout conditions for the exact plan you buy. High leverage cuts both ways too; at 1:200 an account can breach as fast as it compounds. Cheap to try, well-evidenced on payouts, but do your homework on the program structure first.
All FundedHive reviews → - Eightcap Challenges3.9Jul 23, 2026
by WhatProp Editorial TeamEditorial
Real-broker backing, experimental challenge formats
Eightcap Challenges stands out for who runs it: the challenge arm of Eightcap, an established brokerage, which shows in the infrastructure — MetaTrader 4 and 5, TradeLocker and TradingView, 1:100 leverage, and conventional One-Phase and Two-Phase evaluations from $5,000 up to $200,000 with an 80% split. Alongside the classics sits something genuinely unusual: timed Day Trader challenges (one to eight hours) with a 100% split on small balances, effectively a sprint format no major rival offers. The caution flags are equally clear. The program launched recently, the firm has not yet published a payout-proof feed, and the novel timed formats have little public track record to judge. If broker-grade execution matters more to you than a long funding history, this is one to watch; if verified payout receipts are your first filter, wait until the record fills in.
All Eightcap Challenges reviews → - Dominion Funding4.5Jul 23, 2026
by WhatProp Editorial TeamEditorial
One clean 1-step model, but crypto-only payouts
Dominion Funding keeps its offer deliberately simple: a single Standard 1-step evaluation across account sizes from $7,500 to $100,000, an 80-90% split once funded, and scaling headroom advertised to a $400,000 allocation. Platform support covers cTrader, MetaTrader 5 and TradingView, with leverage stated at 1:50 — conservative next to the 1:100 most forex funders quote, which risk-heavy strategies should factor in. The firm has begun publishing payout confirmations, though the public record is still short. The biggest practical caveat is payout rails: crypto is currently the stated withdrawal route, so traders who need bank transfers should confirm options with support before buying. A young firm with an easy-to-understand product; the single-model clarity is genuinely refreshing, but the thin payout history and crypto-only withdrawals keep it in the promising-not-proven column for now.
All Dominion Funding reviews → - Alpha Capital Group4.6Jul 23, 2026
by WhatProp Editorial TeamEditorial
A serious UK contender with every platform you could ask for
Alpha Capital Group's strongest card is choice. Few funders support six platforms — MetaTrader 4 and 5, cTrader, DXtrade, TradeLocker and TradingView — and the evaluation lineup is just as broad: Alpha One in one- or two-step form, a cheaper Alpha Pro variant with tighter 6% targets, a three-step Alpha Three for smaller upfront fees, and a Swing program for position traders. Accounts run from $5,000 to $200,000 with scaling to a $400,000 allocation ceiling, leverage tops out at 1:100, and the funded split is a flat 80%. Payouts move over bank transfer, crypto (USDT/USDC/BTC), Rise and Wise, and the firm publishes payout receipts. The trade-offs: 80% is now below the 90-100% headline splits younger rivals advertise, and the sheer number of program variants makes the pricing page harder to compare than it should be. As a UK-based operation with broad platform support and documented payouts, it earns its place on a shortlist — just budget a few minutes to work out which Alpha program actually fits you.
All Alpha Capital Group reviews → - Take Cap3.9Jul 8, 2026
by WhatProp Editorial TeamEditorial
Early placeholder rating
This is a preliminary WhatProp editorial entry for Take Cap. Its challenge structure, fees, and withdrawal process are still being verified by our team, so no detailed specifics are asserted here yet. Confirm the current terms on the firm's site and keep initial account sizes small until you have cleared a payout.
All Take Cap reviews → - One Funded4.6Jul 8, 2026
by WhatProp Editorial TeamEditorial
Awaiting verified data
One Funded is under editorial review while we gather and verify its trading conditions and payout track record. This is an interim placeholder rather than a full assessment, and it will be expanded with confirmed specifics. Until then, judge the firm on its published rules and take an early withdrawal on a small account to test the process.
All One Funded reviews → - Next Level Funded3.8Jul 8, 2026
by WhatProp Editorial TeamEditorial
Provisional coverage note
Next Level Funded has been added to the catalog and its full review is pending. We have not yet finished verifying its evaluation targets, payout terms, and platform list, so treat this as a provisional rating. Confirm the live rules directly and prove out a payout before scaling your account.
All Next Level Funded reviews → - Neomaaa Funded4.6Jul 8, 2026
by WhatProp Editorial TeamEditorial
Coverage being compiled
Early editorial note on Neomaaa Funded. We are still compiling its verified challenge rules, fees, and platform coverage, and this entry will be updated once that data is complete. As with any newer firm, confirm the rules on the firm's own site and test the withdrawal process on a small account first.
All Neomaaa Funded reviews → - Global Forex Funds3.6Jul 8, 2026
by WhatProp Editorial TeamEditorial
Verification still ongoing
Global Forex Funds is on our editorial watchlist while we verify its rules and payout history. We have not independently confirmed its challenge targets, drawdown limits, or withdrawal schedule, so this note is an early placeholder. Read the current terms in full and keep position sizes measured until the firm proves out a payout for you.
All Global Forex Funds reviews → - Funded Guru4.7Jul 8, 2026
by WhatProp Editorial TeamEditorial
Recently listed, not yet scored
Funded Guru has been added to WhatProp and is awaiting a complete editorial write-up. Our team is still confirming its evaluation structure, pricing, and payout reliability, so this is a preliminary rating only. Check the firm's published rules directly and clear a small withdrawal before trading larger size.
All Funded Guru reviews → - Flagship Funded4.1Jul 8, 2026
by WhatProp Editorial TeamEditorial
Full review on the way
Flagship Funded has recently been listed and its full editorial assessment is still in progress. We are verifying the challenge rules, profit split, and withdrawal process before committing to detailed specifics. Until that is done, confirm the current terms on the firm's site and test a payout on a modest account first.
All Flagship Funded reviews → - Evercrest Funding4.5Jul 8, 2026
by WhatProp Editorial TeamEditorial
Still gathering the details
Evercrest Funding is under active editorial review. Detailed trading conditions and a payout track record are still being gathered, so this entry is an interim rating rather than a full write-up. Judge the firm on its published rules and your own due diligence, and start small before adding size.
All Evercrest Funding reviews → - E 8 Markets4.5Jul 8, 2026
by WhatProp Editorial TeamEditorial
Fresh listing, review to follow
This is a preliminary WhatProp editorial entry for E8 Markets. We have not yet confirmed its evaluation targets, fees, and platform coverage, and will expand this note once that data is verified. As always, confirm the live terms directly and keep initial account sizes conservative until you have tested a payout.
All E 8 Markets reviews → - Clarity Traders3.9Jul 8, 2026
by WhatProp Editorial TeamEditorial
Editorial assessment pending
Clarity Traders has been added to WhatProp and is queued for a full editorial write-up. Our team is still verifying its challenge structure, drawdown limits, and payout process, so treat this as an early placeholder rather than a complete assessment. Read the firm's current rules on its own site and prove out a withdrawal on a small account before scaling.
All Clarity Traders reviews → - Aqua Funded4.1Jul 3, 2026
by WhatProp Editorial TeamEditorial
Not yet fully assessed
This entry for Aqua Funded is a work in progress. We have not yet validated its trading conditions or how consistently it pays out, so treat the rating as early-stage. Start on a small account and read the full rule set before committing.
All Aqua Funded reviews → - Blueberry Funded4.6Jul 3, 2026
by WhatProp Editorial TeamEditorial
Preliminary coverage
Blueberry Funded has been added ahead of a complete review. We want to verify its challenge model and payout reliability before writing more, so this rating is preliminary for now. Confirm the current conditions directly with the firm.
All Blueberry Funded reviews → - Super Funded4.3Jul 3, 2026
by WhatProp Editorial TeamEditorial
Details being verified
Our editors are still working through Super Funded. Its published rules have not been fully cross-checked, and its payout history is not yet confirmed, so this entry is provisional. Read the terms carefully and test a withdrawal before scaling up.
All Super Funded reviews → - Upcomers3.8Jul 3, 2026
by WhatProp Editorial TeamEditorial
Interim editorial note
Upcomers is queued for editorial coverage. We are still gathering verified details on its evaluation, pricing, and payouts before publishing a full view. Until then, treat this as a preliminary placeholder and do your own checks.
All Upcomers reviews →