Skip to content
The Prop Firm That Pays... Coupon …WHATPROP

Best FXIFY alternatives

By Tomas Rieder

·

FXIFY charges $59 for Lightning Evaluation and $79 for Instant Funding Lite. Cheap entry. But 1:50 leverage, crypto-and-e-wallet-only payouts, and biweekly withdrawal cycles create friction if you scalp high volume or need flexible capital access. Three alternatives, Upcomers, The Prop Trade, Texaris, each solve a different bottleneck: extreme cost reduction, maximum leverage, or faster crypto payouts. Which limit costs you trades first?

Side-by-side comparison

Feature comparison of FXIFY, Upcomers, The Prop Trade, Texaris
FeatureFXIFYUpcomersThe Prop TradeTexaris
CountryUnited KingdomUnited Arab EmiratesUnited Arab EmiratesUnited Arab Emirates
Websitefxify.comupcomers.comtheproptrade.comtexaris.com
Cheapest one-step challenge$59 (Lightning Evaluation)$429 (Oracle, instant funding)$50 (Instant Funding MT5, $5K account)$96 (1 Step Challenge)
Cheapest multi-step challenge$79 (Instant Funding Lite)$139 (Eon, 5 steps)$50 (PayFlex Edge, 1 step, $5K account)$69 (2 Step Challenge)
Best profit split90% (Lightning Evaluation)99% (all challenges)80% (all challenges)80% (all challenges)
Max leverage1:501:1001:501:500
Payout frequencyBiweekly / 10 trading daysOn-demand (Oracle); Challenge completion (Astral, Obsidian, Eon)On-demand (Instant Funding, PayFlex Edge)24-hour crypto payouts
Payout methodsCrypto, E-walletWithdrawal, Bank Transfer, Crypto, E-wallet, USDT (Tron), USDC (Ethereum)Withdrawal, CryptoCrypto (USDT), Crypto (BTC), Withdrawal, 24-hour payouts
EAs allowedYes (MT5, DXtrade, MT4, TradingView)Yes (all platforms)No (third-party EAs and automated strategies banned firm-wide)Yes (TradeLocker, MT4, MT5)
PlatformsMetaTrader 5, DXtrade, TradingView, MetaTrader 4, Tradovate, NinjaTraderMetaTrader 5, TradeLocker, Match-Trader, cTrader, DXtrade, BybitcTrader, MetaTrader 5, TradeLockerTradeLocker, MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5

How we evaluate

We score each firm on 6 weighted criteria, weighting regulation & trust, challenge cost & value, payouts & profit split most heavily, using each firm's official pages and our verified catalog data. Figures reflect the last-verified date on this page; where a firm does not publish a detail we mark it "Not publicly stated" rather than estimate.

  • Regulation & trust20%
  • Challenge cost & value20%
  • Payouts & profit split20%
  • Trading platforms15%
  • Leverage & risk rules15%
  • Support & transparency10%

Top alternatives

1Top pick

Best for: Traders prioritizing profit retention and willing to pass multi-step evaluations

Why it stands out

Upcomers' Eon challenge ($139, five steps) offers a 99% profit split versus FXIFY's 90% on Lightning. Over a $2,000 profit month, this difference amounts to $180 extra per account. On-demand payouts beat FXIFY's biweekly cycle, and leverage up to 1:100 doubles FXIFY's cap.

Watch out for

The five-step Eon evaluation enforces 3% daily and 3% max drawdown limits, which are tighter than FXIFY's 3% daily / 4% max on Lightning. Multi-step progression is slower for impatient traders, and payout methods lean crypto/stablecoin; traditional bank transfer is available but slower.

Best fit

Swing traders and position traders who trade fewer than 20 days per month and can absorb the drawdown rules. Not ideal for aggressive scalpers or those who need capital in 24 hours.

Best for: Manual traders who want instant funding under $100 without a profit target

Why it stands out

The Prop Trade Instant Funding ($50-$100) provides immediate capital access with no preset profit gate, you trade within drawdown rules and withdraw on-demand. This is $9-$21 cheaper than FXIFY Lightning ($59) upfront, and on-demand crypto payouts beat FXIFY's biweekly cycle.

Watch out for

The Prop Trade bans third-party EAs and automated strategies firm-wide; if you use an algorithm, you can't trade here. The 50% profit split is the lowest on this list, and leverage is capped at 1:50 (same as FXIFY, so no edge for volatility traders). Account sizes beyond $5K and $10K tiers aren't published.

Best fit

Day traders and scalpers who trade manually and can accept a 50/50 profit split in exchange for instant capital and no evaluation gates. Not suitable for traders using bots or seeking better profit retention.

Best for: Crypto and volatility traders who need extreme leverage and 24-hour payouts

Why it stands out

Texaris allows leverage up to 1:500 versus FXIFY's 1:50 cap, a 10x advantage for Bitcoin, Ethereum, or 1-minute breakout trades. The 2 Step Challenge ($69) matches FXIFY's Lightning pricing, and 24-hour crypto payouts (USDT, BTC) are faster than FXIFY's biweekly cycle. EAs are allowed.

Watch out for

High leverage (1:500) amplifies losses faster; a 1% adverse move hits harder and rule violations are enforced tighter. Drawdown rules on 1 Step and Instant Challenges aren't published in detail, so you'd need to contact support to confirm exact limits. Only TradeLocker is the primary platform; MT4 and MT5 are secondary. The 80% profit split is lower than FXIFY's 90%.

Best fit

Experienced crypto traders and volatility specialists with tight risk discipline. Not for capital-preservation traders or those who require platform breadth and clarity on all trading rules upfront.

Quick verdict

Pick Upcomers if you want 99% profit splits and on-demand payouts (Eon is $139 for five steps). Pick Texaris if you need leverage beyond 1:50, up to 1:500. Pick The Prop Trade if you want instant funding under $100 and trade manually.

The biggest gap: FXIFY charges $59-$79 per challenge with 80-90% splits and biweekly payouts. Upcomers costs $139 for Eon but pays 99% and lets you withdraw on-demand. Texaris matches FXIFY's $69 two-step entry but offers 10x the leverage ceiling. The Prop Trade goes lower at $50 instant but bans EAs and caps leverage at 1:50.

Last verified: 2025-01-01

How we selected these alternatives

Infographic: Cheapest one-step challenge compared across FXIFY, Upcomers, The Prop Trade, Texaris

This comparison pulls from verified public rules, official pricing pages, and platform support published by each firm. We ranked alternatives by how directly they fix the three core constraints traders cite when leaving FXIFY: (1) challenge cost and profit split; (2) leverage cap and account size ceiling; (3) payout speed and method flexibility. Every number here, fee, drawdown, leverage, payout figure, comes from the firm's official docs. We didn't estimate or invent anything.

What makes a good alternative to FXIFY

A strong FXIFY replacement solves at least one pain point:

  • Lower challenge fees or higher profit splits for traders tired of paying $59-$79 per attempt or splitting profits 80:20 with the firm.
  • Higher leverage for traders who hit FXIFY's 1:50 ceiling on volatile pairs or tight time frames.
  • Faster or more flexible payouts for traders stuck waiting biweekly or needing non-crypto withdrawal options.
  • Platform or asset flexibility for traders who want to use EAs, trade crypto directly, or access more instruments than FXIFY's lineup.
  • On-demand funding without a profit target for traders who want to prove themselves without a preset threshold.

No single alternative dominates all five. Each firm below is strongest in one or two areas and carries trade-offs in others.

Quick comparison table

FeatureFXIFYUpcomersThe Prop TradeTexaris
Cheapest one-step challenge$59 (Lightning)$429 (Oracle)$50 (Instant MT5 $5K)$96 (1 Step)
Cheapest multi-step challenge$79 (Instant Lite)$139 (Eon, 5 steps)$50 (PayFlex Edge $5K)$69 (2 Step)
Profit split (best)90% (Lightning)99% (all)80% (all)80% (all)
Max leverage1:501:1001:501:500
Payout frequencyBiweekly/10 daysOn-demand (Oracle)On-demand (Instant)24-hour crypto
Payout methodsCrypto, E-walletBank, Crypto, Stablecoin, E-walletCrypto, WithdrawalCrypto (USDT, BTC)
EAs allowedYes (MT5, DXtrade, MT4)YesNo (firm-wide policy)Yes
PlatformsMT5, DXtrade, TradingView, MT4, Tradovate, NinjaTraderMT5, TradeLocker, Match-Trader, cTrader, DXtrade, BybitcTrader, MT5, TradeLockerTradeLocker, MT4, MT5

Best alternatives by specific pain

Upcomers: If you want the lowest cost + highest profit split

Best for: Traders willing to take on more evaluation steps to keep fees low and maximize take-home profit.

Why it's a strong alternative: Upcomers' Eon challenge costs $139 for a $100K account with a five-step evaluation. FXIFY's $59 one-step looks cheaper on paper. But the profit split swings hard in Upcomers' favor: 99% to trader vs FXIFY's 90%. Over a $2,000 profit month, you keep $1,980 (Upcomers) instead of $1,800 (FXIFY), a $180 monthly edge. On-demand payouts mean you don't wait for cycle-end to withdraw. The Astral ($199, three steps) and Obsidian ($169, four steps) challenges split the difference between cost and step count. Oracle ($429, instant funding) gives you immediate capital if you can pay upfront and trade without a profit target.

Key features:

  • 99% profit split on all challenges (vs FXIFY's 80-90%).
  • On-demand payouts for Oracle; Astral/Obsidian/Eon payout on completion.
  • Leverage up to 1:100 (vs FXIFY's 1:50).
  • Six platforms including Bybit for crypto trading.
  • Promo code BOGO90 and risk-free trial available.
  • Eligible countries include US, UK, AU, DE, CA, NZ, IE, ES, IT, FR.

Potential drawback: The five-step Eon challenge requires you to pass 2% profit targets across five runs, each with 3% daily and 3% max drawdown limits. Tighter than FXIFY's 3% daily / 4% max on Lightning, so you have less margin for intraday swings. If you scalp tight, those five gates will slow you down. Upcomers' payout methods list stablecoins (USDT, USDC) on Tron and Ethereum, which adds friction if your preferred on-ramp is a traditional bank, bank transfer's available but slower than crypto bridges.

Best-fit trader: Swing traders or position traders who can afford the multi-step grind and want to keep more profits long-term. Not ideal for aggressive scalpers or day traders who can't accept tighter drawdowns per step.

The Prop Trade: If you need instant funding under $100

Best for: Traders who want to start trading immediately without a profit target and don't use automated strategies.

Why it's a strong alternative: The Prop Trade's Instant Funding MT5 ($50 for a $5,000 account or $100 for $10,000) is the cheapest path to capital on this list. You get instant access. A 50% profit split. No preset profit target, just a 5% daily / 10% max drawdown rule. No gatekeeping, no multi-step grind. If you want a $10K account to test your edge before scaling up, $100 is hard to beat. On-demand payouts mean you pull crypto the day you're profitable. PayFlex Edge ($50, one-step challenge on $5K) is another low-cost door in if you want to prove yourself first.

Key features:

  • Instant funding ($50-$100, no profit target).
  • On-demand crypto payouts (24 hours typical).
  • Three platforms: cTrader, MT5, TradeLocker.
  • 50% profit split.
  • Leverage up to 1:50.
  • Active discounts: JULY20 (20% off), NEW20 (20% off), ACT30 (30% off PayFlex on $50K+).

Potential drawback: The Prop Trade explicitly bans commercial or third-party EAs and automated strategies. If you trade with an algorithm, this firm will reject you outright. You must code original automated strategies yourself or trade manually. The 50% profit split is also the lowest on this list, you're giving the firm half your profits, which stings over a year. Leverage is capped at 1:50 (same as FXIFY), so high-volatility traders won't gain an edge there. Support for account sizes beyond the $5K and $10K tiers advertised is unclear.

Best-fit trader: Manual day traders and scalpers who want cheap, fast access to capital. Not suitable for traders using third-party bots or anyone who relies on automated execution.

Texaris: If you need maximum leverage or the shortest payout cycle

Best for: Traders who trade crypto or volatile indices and need leverage up to 1:500, or who need 24-hour crypto payouts.

Why it's a strong alternative: Texaris' $69 two-step challenge is $10 cheaper than FXIFY's $79 Instant Lite. The real draw is leverage: Texaris allows up to 1:500 versus FXIFY's 1:50 cap. If you trade BTCUSD, ETHUSD, or 1-minute chart breakouts, that 10x leverage ceiling is a material advantage. The Instant Challenge ($149) gives you instant funding with no profit target, an 80% split, and 24-hour payouts in USDT or BTC. EAs are allowed across all platforms. Account fees are refundable if you don't pass.

Key features:

  • 2 Step Challenge: $69, 8% profit target, 5% daily / 8% max drawdown, 80% split, refundable fee.
  • 1 Step Challenge: $96, drawdowns not publicly stated, 80% split, refundable fee.
  • Instant Challenge: $149, instant funding, 80% split, no profit target.
  • Leverage up to 1:500 (vs FXIFY's 1:50).
  • EAs and bots allowed on TradeLocker, MT4, MT5.
  • 24-hour crypto payouts (USDT, BTC).
  • Affiliate discounts: WHAT30 (30% off).

Potential drawback: Only one primary platform (TradeLocker) is actively listed; MT4 and MT5 are mentioned but secondary. If you're locked into a specific platform or need access to Tradovate or NinjaTrader (available on FXIFY), Texaris is a step backward. The 1 Step and Instant Challenge drawdown rules aren't published in detail, you'd have to contact support to confirm exact daily/max limits for those products. High leverage (1:500) cuts both ways: it amplifies profits but also rule violations. A single large loss can wipe you out faster, and the firm may enforce max drawdown breaches more aggressively at that leverage tier. The 80% profit split is lower than FXIFY's 90% on Lightning and Upcomers' 99%.

Best-fit trader: Crypto and volatility traders who need extreme leverage and can manage risk tightly. Not for capital preservation traders or those who prefer multiple platform options.

Best alternatives by trader type

Swing traders focused on cost: Upcomers Eon ($139, five steps, 99% split) or Astral ($199, three steps). The multi-step grind is manageable if you hold positions 4+ hours and can absorb tight daily drawdowns per pass. The 99% split makes up for the higher entry cost over time.

Day traders who scalp: The Prop Trade Instant Funding ($50-$100, no profit target, on-demand payouts). You avoid the multi-step slog, get capital fast, and withdraw as soon as you're profitable. The 50% split stings, but you don't lose time grinding evaluations.

Crypto and volatility traders: Texaris ($69 two-step or $149 instant, 1:500 leverage, 24-hour payouts). The extreme leverage is the draw. Use the 2 Step if you can pass an 8% gate; use Instant ($149) if you want to trade immediately. Refundable fees reduce downside risk.

Traders who use EAs/bots: Upcomers (all platforms, EAs allowed) or Texaris (EAs allowed on TradeLocker, MT4, MT5). The Prop Trade explicitly bans third-party algorithms, skip it if automation is core to your edge.

Traders in select countries (US, UK, AU, etc.): Upcomers markets to US, GB, AU, DE, CA, NZ, IE, ES, IT, FR. FXIFY doesn't specify country restrictions in the research. The Prop Trade and Texaris don't publish country eligibility. Confirm before signing up.

How to choose the right alternative

Step 1: Identify your primary constraint.

Are you leaving FXIFY because of (a) high fees and low profit splits, (b) leverage too low, or (c) payout speed/method?

  • If it's cost: Go Upcomers (99% split, on-demand payouts). Yes, Eon costs $139, but you recoup it in one profitable month versus FXIFY's 90% split.
  • If it's leverage: Go Texaris (1:500 vs FXIFY's 1:50). Use the 2 Step ($69) or Instant ($149) depending on whether you want a proof-of-concept gate.
  • If it's payout speed/flexibility: Go The Prop Trade (instant, on-demand crypto) or Texaris (24-hour payouts). Both beat FXIFY's biweekly cycle.

Step 2: Check the secondary fit.

Once you've narrowed by primary pain, vet platform compatibility, EA policy, and profit split.

  • Do you use an EA? Texaris or Upcomers (The Prop Trade bans them).
  • Do you need a specific platform? FXIFY has the most breadth (MT5, DXtrade, TradingView, MT4, Tradovate, NinjaTrader). Upcomers has six. Texaris is TradeLocker-primary. The Prop Trade has three.
  • Is profit split critical? Upcomers wins (99%), then FXIFY Lightning (90%), then Texaris and The Prop Trade (both 80%).

Step 3: Trial the evaluation (or start small).

Don't commit to a full account. Use a $5K-$10K challenge first, most of these firms offer low-cost proof-of-concept accounts (Upcomers Eon, The Prop Trade PayFlex Edge, Texaris 2 Step). Spend $69-$139, trade your edge for 1-2 weeks, and see if the platform, drawdown rules, and payout process work for you. Your time is worth more than the fee difference.

FAQs

  • Q: Why is Upcomers' Eon $139 when FXIFY Lightning is only $59? A: Upcomers charges more upfront but gives you 99% profit splits versus FXIFY's 90%. On a $2,000 profit, Upcomers nets you $1,980; FXIFY nets $1,800. The fee pays for itself in one profitable month. Upcomers also offers on-demand payouts; FXIFY waits biweekly. If you're a consistent trader, Upcomers' model favors you long-term.

  • Q: Can I use an EA on all three alternatives? A: No. The Prop Trade explicitly bans third-party EAs and automated strategies firm-wide. Upcomers and Texaris both allow EAs on MetaTrader 5, TradeLocker, and other supported platforms. If automation is core to your edge, skip The Prop Trade.

  • Q: What's the catch with Texaris' 1:500 leverage? A: High leverage amplifies both profit and loss. A 1% move against you triggers a rule violation or drawdown breach faster at 1:500 than at 1:50. Texaris' max drawdown rules (5% daily, 8% max on the 2 Step) are tighter than FXIFY's, so you have less room to swing. Use high leverage only if you can manage 1-2% position sizes and have iron risk discipline. Overleverage is the fastest way to blow an account.

  • Q: Why does The Prop Trade have the lowest entry cost? A: The Prop Trade's Instant Funding ($50-$100) has no profit target, you just trade within drawdown rules. FXIFY's Lightning ($59) requires a 5% profit gate. No gate means lower barrier to entry but also lower selectivity on the firm's side. The Prop Trade makes it back in the 50% profit split and EA ban. For serious traders, the extra $9-$21 for FXIFY or Upcomers buys you a clearer evaluation or higher split.

  • Q: When should I stay with FXIFY instead of switching? A: Stay with FXIFY if (1) you use Tradovate or NinjaTrader and don't want to change platforms, (2) you value its six-platform choice and broad asset mix, or (3) the $59 Lightning entry and 90% split already work for your trading style and you're not hitting the 1:50 leverage cap. Switching costs time and mental energy. Only move if one of the three alternatives above directly solves a trading bottleneck you hit weekly.

Our verdict

Pick Upcomers for profit retention, Texaris for leverage, The Prop Trade for instant capital, or stay with FXIFY if none of these constraints limit your trading

Your decision hinges on which single constraint is costing you trades or money most.

If you're leaving FXIFY because of low profit splits and want to keep more of your gains, go Upcomers. The Eon challenge costs $139 (vs FXIFY's $59), but the 99% profit split means you recoup the fee in one profitable month if you trade a $2K profit. On-demand payouts and 1:100 leverage are bonuses. Trade-off: multi-step evaluation (five gates) and tighter daily drawdowns per step (3% vs FXIFY's 3% on Lightning, but Upcomers holds it across all five steps, which compounds the pressure). Best for swing traders who trade 10-20 days per month and can manage evaluation discipline.

If you're leaving FXIFY because 1:50 leverage is too low, go Texaris. Leverage up to 1:500 is a 10x advantage for Bitcoin, Ethereum, and tight breakout trades. The 2 Step Challenge costs $69 (same as FXIFY's entry-to-multi-step ratio) and 24-hour crypto payouts beat FXIFY's biweekly cycle. Trade-off: high leverage cuts both ways, losses amplify faster, and you must manage 1-2% position sizes or risk account wipeout. Drawdown rules on Texaris' 1 Step and Instant challenges aren't published, so you'd need support confirmation before committing. Best for experienced crypto and volatility traders with tight risk discipline.

If you're leaving FXIFY because biweekly payouts and high entry costs are slowing your capital velocity, go The Prop Trade. Instant Funding ($50-$100) gives you capital the day you sign up. No profit target required, you trade within drawdown rules and withdraw on-demand. This is the fastest path to capital on this list. Trade-off: 50% profit split (the lowest here), no EA support (bans third-party algorithms), and leverage capped at 1:50. Best for manual day traders and scalpers who prioritize speed over profit retention. Not suitable if you rely on automated strategies.

Stay with FXIFY if you use Tradovate or NinjaTrader (unique to FXIFY on this list), you value broad platform choice (six options), or the $59 Lightning entry and 90% split are already working and you're not hitting the leverage cap weekly. Switching introduces friction and mental overhead. Only move if one of the three constraints above, cost, leverage, or payout speed, is a weekly blocker.

Frequently asked questions

Why is Upcomers' Eon $139 when FXIFY Lightning is only $59?

Upcomers charges more upfront but gives you 99% profit splits versus FXIFY's 90%. On a $2,000 profit, Upcomers nets you $1,980; FXIFY nets $1,800. The fee pays for itself in one profitable month. Upcomers also offers on-demand payouts; FXIFY waits biweekly. If you're a consistent trader, Upcomers' model favors you long-term.

Can I use an EA on all three alternatives?

No. The Prop Trade explicitly bans third-party EAs and automated strategies firm-wide. Upcomers and Texaris both allow EAs on MetaTrader 5, TradeLocker, and other supported platforms. If automation is core to your edge, skip The Prop Trade.

What's the catch with Texaris' 1:500 leverage?

High leverage amplifies both profit and loss. A 1% move against you triggers a rule violation or drawdown breach faster at 1:500 than at 1:50. Texaris' max drawdown rules (5% daily, 8% max on the 2 Step) are tighter than FXIFY's, so you have less room to swing. Use high leverage only if you can manage 1-2% position sizes and have iron risk discipline.

Why does The Prop Trade have the lowest entry cost?

The Prop Trade's Instant Funding ($50-$100) has no profit target, you just trade within drawdown rules. FXIFY's Lightning ($59) requires a 5% profit gate. No gate means lower barrier to entry but also lower selectivity on the firm's side. The Prop Trade makes it back in the 50% profit split and EA ban.

When should I stay with FXIFY instead of switching?

Stay with FXIFY if you use Tradovate or NinjaTrader and don't want to change platforms, you value its six-platform choice, or the $59 Lightning and 90% split already work for your style and you're not hitting the 1:50 leverage cap. Switching costs time. Only move if one alternative above directly solves a constraint you hit weekly.

Related reading